Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people by name: Tom-Toq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was No consensus. Deathphoenix ʕ 19:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

List of people by name: Tom-Toq
One page of what appears to be a grand project which could eventually list everyone in the world. Non-encyclopaedic. The other pages will need attention, too, and obviously this nomination stands for the project as a whole. MichaelMaggs 07:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete all related pages, blatantly fails Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Coredesat 08:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Obvious keep the "grand project" already survived AfD- Articles for deletion/List of people by name- and if this debate came up delete, don't you think that would leave a strange, inexplicable gap in that project? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 08:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep by the grand scheme. Though I would like to see some usage statistics on these list of name pages. -- Koffieyahoo 09:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as part of the Grand Scheme (which I suspect would eventually become more useful as a separate wiki). May be useful to Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged. Would be interested to know how many people are listed in total in this project! Grutness...wha?  09:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * For the separate wiki, see Wikitree. Uncle G 13:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- per nom and Coredesat above -- MrDolomite 14:40, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I can't really see this project being that useful, but this project should be nominated as a whole. Wickethewok 14:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this and all related. We might as well copy in the phone book. 23skidoo 22:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Did I miss something? All the people listed are notable (or at least the majority of them are blue links). Hardly copying the phone book. Fagstein 16:39, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but I do not see your view on this. Delete per above. Fr e ddie Message? 23:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep this is part of a bigger set of lists; no worse than "living people" + "dead people". Carlossuarez46 06:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.