Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people in Playboy 1990-1999


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) -- M P er el  23:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

List of people in Playboy 1990-1999

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipeadia is not simply a collection of lists. Plus people are not notable just for having been in playboy. JeanLatore (talk) 03:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 *  Strong Speedy Keep Notability does not apply to content per WP:NNC. This is a high quality list, and the information is encyclopedic. Debate (talk) 03:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Further to the above, this is not an instance where Notability (people) applies since this is not a stand alone list but a list based on magazine content. In any case, the vast majority of names are blue links and therefore prima facie notable. Debate (talk) 04:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Additional Comment After having his articles, such as Anal Sex with Sluts, deleted, the nom. is clearly trying to make a WP:Point and this afd is simply disruptive. To avoid wasting other editor's time this is a clear Speedy Keep. Debate (talk) 08:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep per above. Question (for JeanLatore) though, why just this decade? Why not the other 40 years that the magazine has been published?   Dismas |(talk) 04:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The other lists also exist. (See "See Also" at the bottom of this article page.) They've no doubt been split to reduce the side of the individual pages. Debate (talk) 04:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, I know. My question was to the nominator of this AFD.  I'm sorry if my question was unclear.  Dismas |(talk) 04:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply I think we've answered your question per my additional comment above. :^) Debate (talk) 09:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply Indeed, thank you. Dismas |(talk) 20:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep This list is a great list. Very well referenced. It meets notability guidelines easily. Undeath (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well sourced informative list with well defined inclusion criteria. Meet inclusion criteria as far as lists on wp goes. KTC (talk) 11:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Informative, discerning list that meets notability criteria. WilliamH (talk) 16:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It summarized an entire decade in just 1 article. I agree that people are not notable just for having been on Playboy, but go after the articles then not after this summary. ⇨ EconomistBR ⇦   Talk  20:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.