Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Benin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:50, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

List of people on the postage stamps of Benin

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:LISTN. For some reason stops in 1969, and despite the claim of being complete until then, it misses e.g. Pierre and Marie Curie (1938) and Churchill, Lincoln and Kennedy (1965). Not improved since 2010, and was viewed by 9 people in the last 90 days, so not a topic of interest for our readers either. Fram (talk) 10:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Africa. Fram (talk) 10:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No WP:RS, one view every ten days, Incomplete list, incredibly obscure topic, and an empty section. In addition to seeming to violate WP:N Googleguy007 (talk) 13:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not sure why you would even create an article in the first place that was already 40 years out of date. Reywas92Talk 13:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete we really need to cut back of philatelycruft in Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * To be frank, it needs to be stamped out per LISTN. Lack of viewers and being out-of-date, however, are not valid rationales. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with what John Pack Lambert says above. I would like to see all of these examples of philatelycruft deleted. The information in this example could perfectly well be included as a subsection in the article on Benin if it were thought to be worth listing at all.  Athel cb (talk) 07:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.