Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Bhutan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

List of people on the postage stamps of Bhutan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Yet another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" that suffers the same problem as the others: unsourced, unmaintained, unverifiable, erroneous, you name it. Prod contested because WP:ITSNOTABLE. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi! I just found that stub and added to it. It exists for other countries as well. I thought it not really useful, although for some countries social scientists have examined the people on postage stamps to make some analysis of the society as a whole, especially historidal or political figures on stamps responding to the government in charge at a certain time. But a list without further comments indeed does not bring much addition to the philatelic information of a certain country, while a short comment like "in those and those periods especially political and historial local persons figured on the postage stamps issued during those times" (if there is any ref available) in the main philatelic page for a country (Postage stamps and postal history of xxx) will do. Best regards. PS: if there is no ref available, I have the habit to write an article in a philatelic magazine on the topic, so I have a ref :-) Leovdvxxx (talk) 09:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)


 * If there is an article worth saving it is Postage stamps and postal history of Bhutan, not this one.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete there are not the multiple sources on this topic we need to show notability. This is a level of philatelycruft that does not fit with the actual purposes of Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:32, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is something for another kind of project, outside of Wikipedia. BD2412  T 21:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.