Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Gabon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

List of people on the postage stamps of Gabon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally, this article is since its creation in 2003 mainly unsourced (one stamp is sourced to a random webshop stamp dealer), ends in 1996 or thereabouts, and has mainly served as a time sink for minor cleanup over the years, without actual improvements or readers (before the Prod, it had about one pageview every 3 days...). Fram (talk) 08:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Africa. Fram (talk) 08:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails LISTN, my WP:BEFORE is turning up material which talks broadly about stamps of Gabon, and even some more specific areas (such as Christian evangelization), but not SIGCOV of the phenomenon of people appearing on stamps. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete we have a source to show one entry on this list is accurate, that is it for sourcing and clearly not enoyugh. We also need sourcing that shows this topic as a whole is notable, and we have none.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing LISTN.--  Chuka Chief talk 14:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. Same as all the others; even if we can prove every single person, we can't prove why the topic of them being on the stamps is in and of itself notable. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails NLIST. Avilich (talk) 00:07, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.