Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Guatemala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

List of people on the postage stamps of Guatemala

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:LISTN. Also: abandoned list, unsourced since its creation in 2013, not of interest to our readers (less than 1 pageview per day). Fram (talk) 13:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Guatemala. Fram (talk) 13:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete while we may be able to verify that these people were on stamps, there is no evidence that the subject of them being on stamps is a noteworthy topic per WP:SALAT. The consensus of other topically similar AFDs is more than strong enough by now. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:55, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No sourcing suggests that this topic is notable. I actually reviewed every entry on this lists, which has probably never been done before. One was said to be a physician, but actually was a link to an article on a Peruvian economist. Another was actually a link on a place in Cuba. So this list is almost half people who seem to lack articles in Wikipedia, that is not a good start. Several of these people never were in Guatemala and have no clear connections to the country. We just have nothing suggesting that this is a list that meets Wikipedia guidelines. A list like this belongs on Wikia, not Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep there should be a general discussion about these lists --Lupe (talk) 22:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Not a reason. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The list has no sources at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:47, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment – I believe sourcing is available offline; I have a good idea where to start looking, but unfortunately cannot commit the time to do so. I'm still undecided on whether such a list is worth keeping, but on the bright side I took note of a few subjects that meet WP:N but have no articles yet. As an aside, I have restored some of the links removed by since the articles do exist. –FlyingAce✈hello 18:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.