Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who changed the world

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was USERFY. Sometimes you have to just ignore all rules and do the right thing. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 00:51, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

List of people who changed the world
Do you need a reason? Inherently and irredeemably POV, also inexaustable - Who hasn't changed the world? --Doc Glasgow 20:12, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Inherently POV. Zzyzx11 | Talk 20:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Doc is right. This is just list for list's sake. Derek Ross | Talk 20:16, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with you lot.   &mdash; J I P | Talk 20:17, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pointless. Quale 20:20, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Depending on how one defines the term, the world has been changed either by everyone or no-one.  If we reason that breathing oxygen changes the world (which it technically does), then I guess we all deserve an entry.  But nobody can be said to truly change the planet Earth in any noticable long-term way.  Some would argue that pollution has changed the world somewhat, but that's certainly not the work of any one person.  Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  20:32, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, misguided Gazpacho 20:34, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * PS On another note, this is also inherently POV and a likely magnet for vandalism/nonsense. Current examples from the list: Amanda Smith (which one do they mean? none of them have articles currently) and John Weasley (a Harry Potter character on whom we also have no article. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  20:40, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. an irrelevant POV list --Neigel von Teighen 20:43, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. The title sounds like a bad joke. -- Natalinasmpf 20:44, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Oh, you've got to be kidding. Gamaliel 20:45, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete List is rather unmaintainable and list articles should be done in category pages.
 * Delete inherently POV and too hard to maintain, all celebrities have changed the world significantly in some way. Side note: I'm not sure John Weasley exists, but he sure isn't a Harry Potter character ([http:www.hp-lexicon.org see Harry Potter Lexicon]). He's only shares some of the characters' last name. Mgm|(talk) 21:29, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't know... there is a J K Rowling interview which mentions a "John Weasley" but that might just be a trascription error. Googling shows mostly Potter fanfic characters and partial names... there was apparently an American Idol singer named John Weasley Stevens, for example. Ah well, suppose it's a bit of a moot point at the moment anyway.Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  14:10, May 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: A little background. The contributor is 12 years old, a newbie who has already built an excellent user page and signed up for the Cleanup Taskforce. I agree with most of the above, but maybe a little more encouragement on his talk page would be good too. No vote (mainly because it's unnecessary). Andrewa 22:14, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy to User:ImpalerBugz with great affection and respect.  This made me smile.  Thank you. I love Wikipedia too. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I moved it. It's a good list, but POV. I like this guy, he's cool and eager and bright.  --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:47, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)