Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have been considered deities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

List of people who have been considered deities

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reason no original research E65B0DCE58CBECF21E7C9FF7318F3B57 (talk) 02:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Appears to be an incomplete listification of Category:Deified people, where it appears in a hatnote. Doesn't smell like OR exactly; more like a cross-namespace POVFORK. Seems to fail LISTCRIT due to unclear inclusion criteria, given the much narrower scope than the category it purports to describe. Some of the writeups are poor. Some also lack citations, which are likely to be found in the linked articles. Folly Mox (talk) 03:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Religion.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets the general criterion of WP:NLIST.  reviewing . Other texts like,  There are indeed some clear ways to improve this, including requiring RS for each entry, improving the summaries, etc. &mdash;siro&chi;o 05:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Pretty good list in keeping with WikiProject Lists guidelines. The Category:Deified people at the bottom would be correct to be there. Net positive for Wikipedia. — Maile (talk) 14:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep – It should be improved, not deleted in this case. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 15:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * KeepExpand, improve as needed. AFD is not the place for cleanup. This is a notable topic. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per the comments above: notable topic, most members meet WP:NLIST. Policy says keep.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 00:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - WP:DINC. The concept is widely referred to in secondary and tertiary literature, and the examples are valid (if woefully slishod and incomplete). Cheers, Last1in (talk) 15:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NLIST and the comments above. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 23:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.