Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people with dreadlocks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was d e lete. east. 718 at 04:55, March 2, 2008

List of people with dreadlocks

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Indiscriminate list; none of these people have anything in common besides having dreadlocks. There are quite a few red links as well, and this list certainly borders on WP:NOT. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. An unhelpful list. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:LC. — Save_Us   †  01:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sort of a pointless list; what if they change their hairstyle? --Dhartung | Talk 01:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom.  Esradekan Gibb   "Talk" 02:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete There's probably at least a million people with dreadlocks in the United States alone. Much more are in other countries. What I'm saying here is that the list is pointless, and people with dreadlocks are likely to add themselves repeatedly. Thus, I !vote delete. jon ( blab ) 01:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 01:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Save_Us. Tiptoety  talk 01:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Too indiscriminate for my liking. Blueboy96 02:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It's pretty dreadful. Mandsford (talk) 05:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Always the witty one... Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 05:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, the list has no encyclopaedic value. Guest9999 (talk) 11:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't think I need to even give a rationale for this... EJF (talk) 12:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete this canonical example of listcruft. Guy (Help!) 13:47, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete definitely WP:NOT. I notice some notable examples are at the Dreadlocks article already anyway, as they should be. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and WP:SNOW it. Yngvarr (c) 16:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT and WP:INDISCRIMINATE, complete listcruft Doc StrangeTelepathic Messages Strange Frequencies 17:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - silliest thing I've heard all day.-- TreasuryTag talk contribs  19:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * delete - A meaningless list; unmaintainable, unreferenced, trivial - ask yourself, why would anyone look this up? --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * delete - Unmaintainable, indiscriminate, etc.  ◄   Zahakiel   ►  21:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.