Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of philosophical questions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Is it snowing out there? Stifle (talk) 21:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

List of philosophical questions

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Ok, done that, (8,366 bytes), thanks for the suggestion.Newbyguesses - Talk 06:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unworkable list with potentially endless number of entries. Jersey Devil 05:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. infinite potential for expansion, splitting up into multiple pages doesn't seem workable. Simões ( talk/contribs ) 05:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral &mdash; request that a copy be available, archived, if article is deleted, if this be in order,Newbyguesses - Talk 05:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The list criterion is far too broad.  Alternatively move to Newbyguesses' userspace if he would like to work on it.  Someguy1221 05:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete It's not a list, it's a directory, and Wikipedia is clearly not a directory. Calgary 06:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and change to category. Groupthink 06:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 09:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 *  Strong Snow delete Extreme end of cruft. Recommend that any questions with their own articles be put into Category:Philosophical questions.Blueboy96 16:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Way to broad, indiscriminate a topic. VanTucky  (talk) 18:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete very broad, possibly endless number of entries. Oysterguitarist 20:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * keep. This looks even humoristic!Ttturbo 22:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Not that we haven't heard about these in a college class, but there's no excuse for not sourcing this. Nearly any philosophy textbook, even Philosophy for Dumbasses, would be a source. If a tree falls in a forest, and you can't prove that anyone heard it, it didn't make a noise. Mandsford 22:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; missing the obvious questions in this context: if this list were deleted, would it ever have really existed? and where would its bits go? Carlossuarez46 06:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.