Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of players provided by clubs to Brazil national football team at the FIFA World Cup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

List of players provided by clubs to Brazil national football team at the FIFA World Cup

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This list appears to be copied from this 2014 Globo blog post which proves that there is at least one source covering this topic but I question whether there is significant coverage sufficient to warrant a stand-alone article per WP:GNG/WP:LISTN. Topic is already covered at Brazil at the FIFA World Cup in what I would say is enough depth so this extra article seems to be a bit excessive for what is basically sports trivia. If this is to be kept or turned into a redirect, I would suggest changing the title as the current title is worded clumsily and suggests that this is a list of players when it is in fact a list of clubs that have let their players be released for international duty. This potentially violates WP:NOTSTATS. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, I decided to create this article separately so as not to overload Brazil at the World Cup, and because there is a parallel at pt.wiki, I imagine the biggest problem was the very long name. If you choose to delete, can the content be moved? Svartner (talk) 19:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Lists,  and Brazil.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:27, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - further to WT:FOOTBALL discussion, not needed and already covered elsewhere. Such an awkward title that serves no purpose as a redirect. GiantSnowman 17:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I do not think the content needs to be moved, as beyond what is already included in Brazil at the FIFA World Cup the detail becomes excessive. An external link at the end of the article should suffice. Toadspike (talk) 04:39, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above comments. A separate article for this is not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:36, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't see the title being much of a search term and in my view this clearly looks like one of those articles suggested not to do with WP:NOSTATS. Govvy (talk) 09:20, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Feels a bit like WP:FANCRUFT to me. If consensus was to keep/redirect, I agree with Spiderone, the title would need to change as it is quite confusing/misleading at the moment. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete- looks like WP:FANCRUFT to me. SPF121188  (tell me!) (contribs) 16:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: The page is lacking notability. The information can / should be integrated into the pages for individual campaigns such as Brazil at the 1986 FIFA World Cup where the home club of the players would fit nicely. Gusfriend (talk) 01:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I read the title three times and barely understood what it was about. Incomprehensible WP:FANCRUFT nobody is going to look for or need. Dronebogus (talk) 14:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.