Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of populistic pieces


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Petros471 12:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

List of populistic pieces
Delete - there is no useful or objective definition of "populistic pieces". I noticed this because it was very near the top of the Special page - Oldest articles (Special:Ancientpages): it has not been edited since 17 July, 2004, and it shows - no-one is remotely interested in it. Mais oui! 07:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The associated "main article" is the redlink Populist music, which causes the template it appears on to be listed at Templates with red links/2006jan25-2. --Mais oui! 07:39, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is "populistic" even a word? -- GWO
 * The phrase "populistic music" gets exactly one ghit. "Populist music" gets around three hundred, many of which are just malaprops for "popular music". Zetawoof(&zeta;) 08:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. That's a granddaddy of an article, but with no context and no objective definition of the title it's POV-by-implication. Z iggurat 22:24, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.