Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of porn stars who are lesbians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 09:20Z 

List of porn stars who are lesbians

 * – (View AfD) (View log)



Basically listcruft that has no encyclopedic merit. This is really a glorified category listing, which nearly mirrors similar categories already established on WP. Thus delete. Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 04:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:OR. JPG-GR 04:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research... - Denny 04:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Unsourced OR. Also violates WP:BLP 23skidoo 05:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Is it really a violation of BLP to "accuse" someone of being a lesbian? Isn't that like accusing someone of being tall or Catholic?- Dmz5  *Edits**Talk* 06:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, not speedy - OR is not a criteria for speedy deletion (see WP:CSD). I don't think WP:NOR is the best reason for deletion in this particular case as it is a list, with information possibly taken from the individuals' articles.  However, I'm generally leaning toward deletion as this subject is better handled by existing categories and the list is quite incomplete.  Cheers, Black Falcon 07:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete with prejudice. List of people in arbitrary profession who have an arbitrary attribute, which cannot be verified from reliable sources because the only sources which cover them are inherently unreliable. Guy (Help!) 08:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above: unverifiable. No need for this sort of article. --Austinsimcox 21:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The orientation of porn stars is unverifiable on this scale. What is portrayed in content or in biographies often deviates from truth. NetOracle 01:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Deletewhat's already been said.--TheAlphaWolf 04:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.