Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of porn stars who deepthroat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --Joann e B 10:18, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

List of porn stars who deepthroat
Delete I don't think that this even needs explaning. This, IMO, is what's wrong with Wiki. Completely useless lists that help no one and provide no useful information. This doesn't meet the crieria laid out at WP:LIST and certainly doesn't meet any kind of notability criteria I could come up with. NN, Spam, etc. pm_shef 04:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep The current list is highly inaccurate (as another poster has correctly said, "Most porn starts *DO NOT* deepthroat"). Never-the-less, the list has value even though it is likely to always be somewhat out of date and open to debate.  Personally I don't think something should be deleted just because it is a target for vandalism, it should just be made to be reasonably accurate and then increase the difficulty of editing (as has been done with articles in the political arena).
 * Delete - unless revised to include phone numbers and coupons - seriously, this reads like a bathroom wall, can never be complete, is not useful, etc. Johntex\talk 04:10, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Deepthroat, ahem, I mean Delete per nom. --Mmx1 04:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete BJAODN T   K   E  04:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN the title, delete the list itself (way too big for BJAODN) -- stillnotelf   is invisible  04:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, way too long. :-D  T   K   E  04:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * --Calton | Talk 05:23, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I've actually done a bit of cleanup on this list, removing incorrect links, vandalism etc. While I chose not to nominate this for deletion (after all, there are even less useful and important lists here), I don't think I'll fight too hard to keep it. It's pretty much a vandalism magnet, like the other porn related lists. Delete. Colonel Tom 05:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, even if they offer discounts to Wikipedia editors. --Calton | Talk 05:23, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Icarus 05:30, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unmaintainable list. Perhaps the opposite (List of porn stars who don't deepthroat) would be maintainable, but who would care? Grand  master  ka  05:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I'll have to verify each one. &rArr;    SWAT Jester   [[Image:Flag_of_Iceland.svg|18px|]]  Ready    Aim    Fire!  05:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you should "borrow" Jimbo's credit card? T   K   E  05:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; too much to swallow. Eusebeus 10:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft, hard to maintain. --Ter e nce Ong 13:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - are there any who don't? Vizjim 13:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Very good point, because I believe it's pretty much expected now. Fan1967 21:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Delete'Delete'DeleteDelete Thank You
 * Delete listcruft of porncruft. Just zis Guy you know? 15:34, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I usually am quite fond of lists but this one can serve no useful purpose will never been complete and --err, a certain subjectivity is required between what is mere felatio versus deepthroating -- but let's not go there. And, by the way, why no male stars on the list???? Carlossuarez46 15:57, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If there are a enough notable porn stars who have turnned down jobs because of deepthroat scenes, then you might be able to create a list of those.  But I suspect that, out of notable porn stars, almost all deepthroat.  JeffBurdges 16:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like a gag. Fagstein 18:12, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uvaduck 18:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and smerge the more verifiable ones to Deep throat (sexual act), ones that appeared in moves with "deep throat" in the title or if mentioned in interviews. I believe most porn stars don't do this. Шизомби 20:55, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Tbeatty 06:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN per stillnotef A dmrb♉ltz (T | C | k) 07:21, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. These days a more useful list would be of stars who don't deep throat. 23skidoo 17:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete porncruft. WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information, as well. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 09:28, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - insufficient notability for its own list, not useful as a way of creating redlinks to be filled, which is the other use for lists; use a category instead, if you must. -- The Anome 11:20, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 08:24, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't think a clear cause for deletion has been reasonably asserted here, and find the list no more arbitrary than many others on Wikipedia. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 02:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Agreed w/ Adrian. This is what's wrong with wiki? I see blatant POV pushing in that sentence. Wikipedia is not censored. Mineralè 02:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:LIST, as listcruft. I don't object to the porno aspect; it's the list aspect.  We need to cut back on low-value hard-to-maintain fan-created lists generally. --John Nagle 04:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.