Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of post–Star Trek: The Next Generation stories


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

List of post–Star Trek: The Next Generation stories

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is frankly fancruft, and incredibly incomplete. I see no educational value in this list - Memory Beta exists for such purposes. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:51, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Looks like this is largely covered already at List of Star Trek novels, which lists them by which TV cast is featured and annotates with an in-universe timeline. All this list does is add some comic book stories, which are also already covered at List of comic books based on Star Trek: The Next Generation. Given that Star Trek spin-off fiction notes that these are non-canon, it's not even that useful to fans to combine the lists because there's no pretense that they form some coherent meta-narrative across the different forms of media. So delete as duplicative and as irrelevant trivia. postdlf (talk) 01:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, actually they've been pretty good about a coherent metanarrative in the post-Nemesis books, but that's beside the point. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Even between the novels and the comic books? postdlf (talk) 16:13, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Can't say I know, but I think that they've been trying. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. This kind of overly specific detail is better covered by fansites and Star Trek wikis, and it's a redundant content fork of lists that already exist. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * comment I don't know how an article like this survived 9 years. I would have AFD'ed it a long time ago.--173.75.214.124 (talk) 03:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.