Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of posting styles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 07:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

List of posting styles

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not useful or notable. Original research. — Omegatron 17:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mostly OR, all sources are unreliable. No need to merge anywhere. --- RockMFR 18:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete OR, no RS, not useful. This is an encyclopedia, after all ST47 Talk 18:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator. Acalamari 19:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unenyclopedic, mostly neologisms/protologisms... "Gimmickposting", for example, gets all of 2 Google hits. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; a bunch of neologisms, and it uses "posting styles" in a different sense from that in the article Posting styles (which discusses top vs. bottom posting) without explaining the distinction. *Dan T.* 22:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - impossible to attribute, total original research, and not notable to boot. --Haemo 01:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete a bunch of neologisms. "Posting Styles" reminds me of the Usenet Olympics for some reason... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 14:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.