Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of preserved Airbus aircraft

List of preserved Airbus aircraft

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Per WP:GNG. I have been unable to find reliable significant coverage on both topics, let alone any. Sources do exist albeit unreliable or non-independent such as Planespotters, OneSpotter and Airfleets and Airbus news releases just to list a few.

Per WP:NLIST. Whilst "The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been", I have been unable to find any reliable sources talking about a list of preserved Airbus aircraft nor a list of preserved A320s. Some entries do have sources talking about their respective aircraft individually but the majority of the entries seem unverifiable with most of the information coming from the said sources above. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

I have also nominated the following related page  because both topics are similar enough as they both cover preserved Airbus aircraft and also share the same issues. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Lists.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism, Europe,  and France. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article has a notability of every airbus aircraft that has survived, if you delete this article, it would basically be deleting the now merged F-WWAI A320 aircraft with it, I'd say that its unnecessary when there are plenty of sources out there on their respective articles, so I am voting a really hard keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airbus A320-100 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 21 July 2024 (UTC)