Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of presidents of Pacific Union College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 16:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

List of presidents of Pacific Union College

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:LISTN. Found no significant coverage of the topic as a group or set in independent reliable sources. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 18:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Arxiloxos (talk) 01:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Arxiloxos (talk) 01:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Obviously, this is the sort of list we have quite often here - see Category:Lists of university and college leaders. This one has the additional benefit of providing information about a lot of people who, while presumably notable as college presidents, do not yet have a wikipedia article. StAnselm (talk) 02:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The position is defining, and the list can say a lot concisely. It makes sense to have this list.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Can you explain precisely how you think this fails LISTN? 'Cause I just don't see it. Jclemens (talk) 03:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep In view of the thumbnail biographies provided, this is a useful substantive article. Merging it to the article on the college would unbalance that article and is thus inappropriate.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.