Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. A snowball won't melt in the Styx before this gets deleted. The Bushranger One ping only 06:14, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a television guide. These are simply lists of shows broadcast by the networks. They're not encyclopedic, difficult to maintain, and basically covered by numerous other pages, including the primary network pages. They are also indiscriminate. Sefcik (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

After close note (Redacted 'extended content' dropdown box which consisted of 344 "List of programs on network" articles or individual network articles besides this one, some of which don't even exist, which were part of this nom for the sake of pageloading and reducing 'what links here' pollution. Linked for full clarity.)  Nate  • ( chatter ) 07:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Keep Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia of Knowledge and generally it is better, in my opinion, to include such things. Listing TV programs is not making Wikipedia a TV guide, and in my view makes the project better as a whole. While a lot of these articles have serious issues, I believe that it is better to clean them up than deleting everything. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 14:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Keep for the same reason reasons as above Digifan23 (talk) 17:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy Keep This resembles the sort of stuff sock operator was up to, i.e. aggressively redirecting, blanking, nominating for deletion. Note please that this is a five day old account whose first ten edits contained at least six gibberish edits to their user page (read: an attempt to quickly get autoconfirmed.) Confusing how a brand new user would find the maintenance of these articles to be difficult. I question the earnestness of this nomination. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep as no valid reason for deletion, My guess is it's a sock but should probably AGF. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  22:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Ridiculous nomination by known block evader, completely bad-faith.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:29, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Whatever type of Keep will quickly put an end to this nonsense. VMS Mosaic (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.