Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon/tables


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 21:58, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon/tables
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

exact duplicate of List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon only organized into tables, there is no need for two programs list only organized differently Caldorwards4 (talk) 18:22, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Perhaps a sortable table would work better?  Maybe it would be a reasonable compromise.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  18:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Redundent - but perhaps this should be moved over the other article? --T-rex 18:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: there was a discussion on the talk page of the other article, which had no consensus.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  18:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * One of the two needs to be deleted --T-rex 21:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Kinda like a content fork, but for formatting, it seems. If there is a dispute over what format to use for the article, its resolution probably doesn't involve making a separate page. Maxamegalon2000 21:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge list style into main list. Much more well organized than the original article, but I'll leave that to those working on the article to sort out.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete/comment Subpages do not exist in the main namespace. But something should be done. One is enough. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 00:27, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Already redundant by main article; also, a list format in the main article is better than the table format, especially since the table presents too much, and often false, information. -- azumanga (talk) 16:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Delete one or the other. Let the article aditors choose the format the like through consensus.Yobmod (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge -- Unlike the current page, this tells information about whether they are still on, are cartoons, or whatever without having to go to each individual page. I do agree that the page should be moved or merged. TheThingy  Talk 23:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete but revert to this format on the main List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon article, and continue to discuss the format on the talk page to come to a consensus. This page is a exact copy-paste move (minus categories and interwiki links) of an old revision of that page, so it could be deleted with no GFDL issues. There appears to be a format dispute on that page between the table format with airdates, and a plain alphabetic list; the talk page shows no consensus for which format to use, but many similar pages (see Category:Lists of television series by network use a format which categorizes by current, future, former shows, and then subcategorizes by genre, and they usually give airdates as years at least. The alphabetical format, on the other hand, provides no more information than a category (e.g. Category:Nickelodeon shows). The proponents of the alphabetical format complain that airdate information is often unsourced, but information like that is not unsourceable. There are plenty of sources for verifiable information about airdates; and if exact airdates are unknown, then months, seasons, or years can be used. DHowell (talk) 23:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.