Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Radio Philippines Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep, nothing really that stands out here which would warrants an article deletion such as WP:V or WP:OR issues. The WP:NOT criteria can be debated for years without results and it can be subjected to various interpretations, so the result has been defaulted to keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by Radio Philippines Network

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOT. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, Wikipedia articles are not Directories, directory entries or a electronic program guide Hu12 (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Srpnor (talk) 12:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep If you will delete this page, maybe you should also delete the list of programs for NBC, ABC and CBS and other major television networks. RPN is a major television network here in the Philippines and deleting this page is just unfair. -Danngarcia (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. This is a standard "List of programs broadcast by Foo" list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Howard the Duck (talk • contribs) 14:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Also fails Lists "However, as Wikipedia is optimized for readers over editors, any lists which exist primarily for development or maintenance purposes (such as a list of red link articles needed) should be in project or user space not the main space"--Hu12 (talk) 14:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I suggest you nominate the NBC and CBS articles first. If they're deleted, I'd happily mark this for speedy deletion. -- Howard  the   Duck  15:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * To suggest that you would mark this for speedy deletion, if someone deletes those first is improper and questionable.--Hu12 (talk) 15:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Now that's systemic bias. Starczamora (talk) 20:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT and WP:LISTS. Long lists of unreferenced redlinks are unhelpful to our readers. — Satori Son 15:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: The red links are mostly local programs produced by RPN during it's heyday (pre-1990s). -- Howard  the   Duck  15:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia (Not a directory), so many "useful" things that do not belong in an encyclopedia are excluded or removed. An encyclopedia should, by definition, be informative and useful to its readers, this is neither.--Hu12 (talk) 15:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * So where should notable red-linked articles be mentioned? -- Howard  the   Duck  15:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Recycle bin..WP:WTAF--Hu12 (talk) 15:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * How about WP:N and for those who can't write articles since they don't have sources but it still passes the notability guidelines? (And essays aren't really convincing.) -- Howard  the   Duck  15:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. For the same reasons I gave in Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by National Broadcasting Network. --Jojit (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. per my Policy based nom. Flawed and inapropriate Non-policy based arguments of regional and ethnic systemic bias do not make for exemption of official Wikipedia policy for which this was nominated. WP:NOT and WP:LISTS.--Hu12 (talk) 18:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.