Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by STAR One


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to STAR One. Stifle (talk) 11:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by STAR One

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I will believe that the former TV-station is notable, but to my opinion a list of programs broadcasted by a no longer existing TV-station is not notable. Side note: completely unsourced The Banner talk 12:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  16:38, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  16:38, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep, this lists notable programming that was original to this notable channel and so is a standard list in this subject area and an index of articles by a significant shared feature per WP:LISTPURP. I can't see how it's relevant that it no longer operates. postdlf (talk) 17:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * It would have a purpose when the TV-station was still there. Now it is just an indiscriminate list hanging in the air. The Banner talk 00:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you're saying that you can't see a purpose to having articles about subjects that no longer exist? Is that really your argument? postdlf (talk) 00:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * No, I think that indiscriminate, unsourced lists of programs transmitted by any station are already non-notable. Unfortunately, I have consensus against me. But here we have the situation of an indiscriminate, unsourced lists of programs transmitted by a station that no longer exists, leaving the list in fact without parent. So I have asked the community to voice their opinion. The Banner talk</i> 15:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The parent article is STAR One and continues to exist even though the subject no longer operates. The fact that these notable television series were original content broadcast by that channel continues to be a significant and defining fact about those series (just as with List of programs broadcast by the DuMont Television Network) and one that we also categorize. "Unsourced" is still not a deletion argument. And I do not think "indiscriminate" means what you think it means (whatever it is you think it means here). postdlf (talk) 16:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Selective Merge - Most tv programmes get merged in to the tv article - I personally see no harm in merging the notable ones & getting rid of the rest (IE redlinked ones). – Davey 2010 Talk 01:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * That's of course fine by me, so long as the information is preserved. Whether there are enough notable programs to merit a standalone list per WP:SIZE and WP:SPLIT is a question of editorial judgment. postdlf (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Selective merge like said. TV station article would be too long if we put the whole list into it. --Mr. Guye (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.