Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by TV Asia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to TV Asia. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by TV Asia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unnecessary list as the channel airs only syndicated programming. Also, a good majority of the links in the article are to non-existent pages. The article does not cite a single source throughout the body, a problem for which it has been tagged since its creation in 2013. Fails WP:SAL. TheRedDomitor (talk) 14:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. TheRedDomitor (talk) 14:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. TheRedDomitor (talk) 14:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. TheRedDomitor (talk) 14:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Completely lacks sources and any information other than the name of the program. Anyone could add their hoax article here, and nobody will notice. Dimadick (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to TV Asia, even if its parent article is... not very good either, I still think a redirect would be fine. Foxnpichu (talk) 16:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. We have 35 articles in Category:TV Asia original programming, I clicked on the first few and they only mention other stations or networks, which would suggest that some or all of that categorization is incorrect. So I don't know if the category is completely incorrect in claiming that there is TV Asia original programming, or if there's a legitimate basis for it such as a relationship with those stations. It would be helpful if related content were cleaned up or addressed first so it's more clear to see what, if any, valid content there is that would belong in this list. postdlf (talk) 20:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * As stated here, most, if not all of it is acquired programming. Foxnpichu (talk) 20:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Just checked, All of it is acquired programming.Sunshine1191 (talk) 02:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete- as per the nominator's rationale, the article fails SAL. Complete lack of sources means also fails GNG. Don't think a redirect will achieve anything particularly as the article isn't going to have much notability in the future either and is an easy spot to add hoax articles, not to mention the TV channel's article itself is completely unsourced. Sunshine1191 (talk) 02:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to TV Asia - as noted, there are no sources to substantiate the content, and its of questionable notability - fails GNG. Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:00, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. I don't think a redirect for something as ambiguous as TV Asia is appropriate. "TV in Asia" or variants might be typed into the search as "TV ASIA"  // Timothy ::  talk  14:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to TV Asia. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.