Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of public relations journals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep; nomination withdrawn and there are no outstanding delete !votes. Non-admin closure. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

List of public relations journals

 * – ( View AfD View log )

List contains only 1 entry that is not a redlink. Delete for the moment, re-create when or if more entries become available. At this point not very informative or helpful. Crusio (talk) 07:53, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Question: Why does this rationale lead to deletion, Crusio?— S Marshall T/C 10:12, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * This is the barest of lists possible. There are no clear inclusion criteria, there is no discussion of the journals included (most of them appear to be non-notable), there are no sources, etc. There is nothing here that could make a list notable or even desirable. --Crusio (talk) 10:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Could the list not be expanded? Could clear inclusion criteria not be devised?  Could discussion of the journals not be added? Could sources not be found?  And does it matter that individual items on a list are not notable?  I'm not seeing anything that isn't fixable here.— S Marshall  T/C 14:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Redlinks are a valid function of lists which help us expand our content. Please see Primer of Public Relations Research which confirms that journals such as Public Relations Quarterly are respectable and merit such attention. Warden (talk) 14:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nom. Per S. Marshall. --Crusio (talk) 14:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.