Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of red-light districts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was nomination withdrawn. - Mailer Diablo 07:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

List of red-light districts
I find that this page contains much ambiguous, unencyclopedic information. One might also argue that it is disparaging to the various places listed. SweetNeo85 22:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. I'm seeing a lot of footnotes to good sources on that page, although many entries on the list are still unsourced. The sensitive nature of the topic is a good reason to aggressively remove unverified information, but not to delete the entire article.  &mdash;Cel ithemis  00:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - well sourced, encyclopaedic. WilyD 11:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. In one sense, "red-light district" is a disparaging term, but the term is still a valid one and in common use. I am not sure if this thing ought to be useful, but it does complement the red-light district article. The North America entries still need sources, but the list seems to be in reasonable shape. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Nomination Withdrawn--SweetNeo85 00:48, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep as nomination has been withdrawn. Ekajati 13:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * HELLOOOOOO Keep it already.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.