Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of relationships on Scrubs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 03:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

List of relationships on Scrubs

 * — (View AfD)

Cruft, plain and simple. We don't need an oh-so-detailed guide to the love lives of characters on a TV show, no matter how awesome said show is. I believe a firm delete is in order, or at most merge into character pages. -- Chris is  me 14:40, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information (specifically, Wikipedia is not for plot summaries). Demiurge 14:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Demiurge. - Aagtbdfoua 15:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete absurd. This really is cruft. Guy (Help!) 16:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into character pages per nom. Just H 16:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep There's a "List of significant others of Friends" article for Friends, which has survived multiple attempts at deletion. Doesn't that allow a prescedent for this? EJB341 17:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I would support the deletion of that page if someone nominated it. TJ Spyke 23:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of cruft MartinDK 17:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I watch this show, but this article is the very definition of original research. It reads like TV Guide crud. Tarinth 18:20, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 23:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the nominator, this information is too specific. Perhaps merge into the Scrubs (TV series) article, however I am sure that the characters list can be made to include the information. TSO1D 00:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge content into revelant character pages. Quack 688 09:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Davidpdx 12:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you know what "indiscriminate" means?
 * Keep or Merge into character pages. -- User:Docu
 * Keep - no valid reason given for me to consider deletion. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 23:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - relationships are the key to TV dramas so it makes sense to itemize them. - Peregrinefisher 00:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- Per above-- SU IT  05:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as crufty as it comes. -- Wizardman 04:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOT: "Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic." '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 17:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I just had a look at some of the character pages, and it seems this page is used as a method of avoiding duplicating information. E.g. for Carla and Turk, instead of having a significant outline of their relationship history on Carla's page, then the exact same thing copy-pasted onto Turk's page, they both link to this page. If a consensus is reached to delete, we should make sure that appropriate information gets merged back into char articles. Quack 688 17:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --  Wikipedical 00:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Chris. Way too much like a fan site. However, some of the prose might be salvagable, to be edited and placed in the main Scrubs article. Blueaster 09:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.