Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of representations of Seattle in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 16:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

List of representations of Seattle in popular culture

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A prod tag was unceremoniously removed. Elements of the list could be turned into categories such as "Movies set in Seattle". List is not really about popular culture anyway, nothing like "Seattle is rainy" or "Everybody's moving to Seattle" are referenced. Fee Fi Foe Fum 03:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The list does what it sets out to do, in that it covers shows, movies, and other popular culture items set in Seattle. (By contrast, I think the list correctly excludes Whose Line Is It Anyway, even though it did once make the joke "Stick it where the sun don't shine/Seattle, Washington" on the show.) —C.Fred (talk) 03:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Ugly list, poorly named, categories are superior in this case. SolidPlaid 03:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. We already have Category:Films set in Seattle, Washington and List of television shows set in Seattle, how many times do we need to duplicate these lists? There's Category:Lists of films by setting, Category:Films by shooting location, and Category:Lists of films by shooting location, which could contain new lists created to cover most of the content. The only notable references left are a few books, they can be mentioned in the Seattle article if anyone cares about them. Crazysuit 04:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom & SolidPlaid. --Evb-wiki 14:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete (changed recommendation). My initial response was to the nominator. However, Crazysuit made a convincing argument: the list is redundant, given the categories mentioned. —C.Fred (talk) 16:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Redundent per categories. -- Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 18:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.