Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of science writers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

List of science writers
Whatever this article tries to do, categories will do better. Subject is also ill defined - are pseudoscientific writers supposed to be included? How technical can an author be? How serious is serious? Finally, just way too general. At least, that's what I think. Fangz 01:40, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A list that includes both Isaac Azimov and Richard Dawkins as 'science writers'? Categorisation is a more efficient way to define people like this.  This list will not assist researchers. -- (aeropagitica) [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg|25px|UK]] 10:11, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. What am I missing? Asimov certainly wrote "serious nonfiction about science aimed at a general audience". And the Dawkins article says he's a "popular science writer". -- JLaTondre 03:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Use the categories, whoever wrote it, use the categories Werdna648T/C\@ 12:10, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * DeleteThis is what catergories are for. Kcordina 13:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.