Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of self-help authors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Categorize (added to my todo list).--Ezeu 04:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

List of self-help authors
Listcruft. Computerjoe 's talk 19:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorize I don't think this is really listcruft. It's not a list that could have infinite entries; it's not an indiscriminate list of information; it isn't unencyclopedic content. I only vote for categorization as opposed to a keep because, by the listcruft guidelines, a list that has no info besides intrawiki links (which this is)should be a category. -- Kicking222 19:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorize. I disagree with the assertion that this is "not a list that could have infinite entries" (Kicking222); there are enough self-help authors in the world that the list might as well be unlimited. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 20:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorize. How else are users going to find self-help authors? apers0n 06:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * They could always take a look in their local library, I suppose. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 07:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorize--Runcorn 20:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.