Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ships in the Honorverse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Valley2 city ‽ 15:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

List of ships in the Honorverse

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A list of fictional objects that is not established as notable via any reliable source independent of the subject findable by me. It's little more than a fan-site collection of the names of ships that have appeared in a work of science fiction. There are many articles on the plots of the books themselves; ships that are important plot elements are mentioned in those summaries. The internet is filled with fansites; wikipedia should not be one of them. Bali ultimate (talk) 13:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Agree, in this case, frankly speaking. Debresser (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable, no significant external sources have been cited that discuss these ships. The only source cited is a genre fan coffee table book. LK (talk) 14:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, who puts it well. I reviewed these all year ago; things have gotten worse, not better. Cheers, Jack Merridew 14:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with Honorverse. Ikip (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * specifically Honorverse? Seems like a poor target. Jack Merridew 08:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep (ships are quite crucial in this series) but definitely transwiki to Honorverse wiki. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 17:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No meaningful real-world information. --EEMIV (talk) 17:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to the Honorverse wiki 70.29.213.241 (talk) 05:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability asserted, completely fails WP:NOT. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 07:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: no significant coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 03:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- Jack Merridew 06:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn fancruft per WP:NOT. Eusebeus (talk) 17:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.