Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sitcoms which feature actors holding the Nintendo 64 controller wrong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow close, delete. Regardless of whatever type of article this is, it's fairly clear that the consensus is to delete. At best this is a WP:ONEDAY type of scenario where this is just something someone came up with on a forum and at worst it's a WP:NOT type of deal. Either way, it doesn't seem to belong on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

List of sitcoms which feature actors holding the Nintendo 64 controller wrong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Put aside your reaction to the title for the moment, because it's not exactly what it says on the tin. What this really is, rather, is a metacommentary about the fact that Wikipedia doesn't have an article about the topic described in the title, sourced only to a Facebook post which wrongly suggests that we do. This is, put simply, not the kind of thing we should have an "article" about — and it shouldn't be repurposed as what its title actually suggests, because that's not the kind of thing we should have an article about either. Taking this to AFD only because there's already a declined speedy in the edit history — I'd have speedied it straight away otherwise. Delete with TNT. Bearcat (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 20:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 20:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and nothing suggests this topic could be reliably sourced. -- Sam Sing! 20:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons already stated... and 1000 internet points to Bearcat for the meta-meta-commentary. —  Noah  20:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * DeleteFails policies and not WP:Notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMagikCow (talk • contribs) 21:05, 6 February 2015‎ (UTC)
 * Redirect to What Wikipedia is not (1st choice). Delete (2nd choice) --Tgeairn (talk) 21:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete This is not article material. I could see an essay of this nature being created but not under this title.--67.68.211.169 (talk) 02:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.