Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of slang terms for excretion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  20:05, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

List of slang terms for excretion
The page provides no value and I don't see how that can be remedied (or why anyone would care to). Simply not needed on Wikipedia. Eugene Medynskiy 22:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

There is no need to delete it, don't be such a stiff, it's funny, why are you looking at it anyway if you think it's so immature? -Jack Gallegos (Captain Awesome)

Thank you Captain Awesome (and perhaps...obvious?) Why are you looking at it, if you don't like it? What in the world were you searching for that lead you to that? Hmmm? (Une_Fleur_du_Mal)

I agree not to delete the article. If your offended then don't read it. We need information on everything, even poop. Wikipedia is a great information source and i dont see how an article on poop could ruin it. -Anarchski

This page provides an audience with alternate usages of slang terms, which may be necessary for the betterment of any and all of the following: an argument, a humorous paper, a serious paper in need of clever comic relief, or verbal entertainment. Unless someone can find me an example of someone/something adversely affected by this page, there is no true logical reason to delete it.


 * Delete per WP:NOT. Durova 22:36, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Its place is in WikiSaurus. mikka (t) 22:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * For the reasons given at Articles for deletion/List of toilet slang, delete. Uncle G 00:25, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not urban dictionary. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nomination, it's what Wikipedia is most certainly not. --Wingsandsword 08:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete It's also a breeding ground for vandals. -- Jbamb 05:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopaedic. AnnH (talk) 20:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.