Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of small-bust models and performers

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:00, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

List of small-bust models and performers
The stupidest thing ever written for Wikipedia? Probably not, but, Christ, what are people thinking? I guess we know where alot of our bad articles are coming from, anyway. -R. fiend 14:33, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subjective. --Scimitar parley 14:42, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I suppose, although I really sort of like the idea myself james gibbon  14:46, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. But the other one is going to likely be kept along with this. The Wikipedia's "encyclopedic" value (okay, that is subjective too) is being degraded by things like this. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 14:51, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, impossible to remain objective. -- Francs2000 | Talk [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] 15:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete IBTC listing. &mdash; RJH 15:22, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * ...I guess we know where alot of our bad articles are coming from, anyway From Germany or what? :-) MutterErde 16:12, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete... before somebody creates list of perfectly-normal-sized-bust models and performers. Flowerparty 16:54, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * This reminds me of a similar list that is on VFD, except the women have big bust. It will be laced with POV, since some people could be insulted if they are put on the list. What I might consider small, someone thinks it's "just right," etc. Delete. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 17:26, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unmaintainable and too broad. 23skidoo 17:27, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I actually provided my rationale several hours before this page was even created. As per what I said on Votes for deletion/List of big-bust models and performers about this very page when it was still a redlink, Delete. Uncle G 18:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete DJ Clayworth 18:05, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Win777 18:14, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Idiots.  Thorns Among Our Leaves 19:04, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Impossible to remain un-biased. No criteria defined for a "small-bust".  See arguments on Votes for deletion/List of big-bust models and performers, as this article is similar. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 20:08, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 *  Keep - arrrgggghhhh. How i hate fake tits ! :-( btw: There´s no red link in it :-) Greetings MutterErde 20:37, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, for same reasons as above and over at the other VfD. I suppose we have List of medium-bust models and performers too, or will that be red? -Splash 22:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:POINT. Proto t c 09:07, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. That's per MutterErde.  Almafeta 02:55, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless this is a substantial porn genre as big-bust is. Dcarrano 18:22, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, since physical attributes are a selection criteria for casting. More refinement of the definition (like excluding males:)) would be welcome. Jamesday 12:54, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Entirely subjective, and impossible to correct. "Bust size" is determined solely by opinion. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 12:55, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, isn't bust size objective? Delete nonetheless. DS 02:25, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, Expand, but Remove POV-personal "shout-out" to small-busted women. There is a useful market definition of this out there:, .  --Jpbrenna 19:27, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * That was not a personal shout-out to small-busted woman, that was a shout against plastic surgery. Again: arrrgggghhhh!!!!!. MutterErde 07:51, 28 July 2005 (UTC) (btw.: i´m wondering that nobody adds a name to that list except me - even Mr.Whales has no idea . Are there in the big USA no more women with nice small natural boobs ?
 * PS: Redlinks please only with external link.Thank you MutterErde 08:03, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.