Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about laziness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. &mdash; J I P | Talk 08:09, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

List of songs about laziness
The term laziness obviously has variable nomenclature; rendering this list unmaintainable.
 * Delete as subtrivial listcruft. --SuperDude 06:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete ambiguity renders it unverifiable; if a list like this could exist, it would need a more exact title and almost wholly new content. Xoloz 08:30, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep -- such vague reasoning for deletion. --Mysidia (talk) 18:00, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 22:40, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Please contribute to Centralized discussion/Lists of songs &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 22:40, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, criteria can be refined as neccessary. Kappa 00:24, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Useful and interesting information. --Centauri 06:39, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as preposterous listcruft. Shall we create an article for every possible topic that a song might be about? MCB 07:10, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - why bother? --MacRusgail 13:03, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an encyclop&aelig;dia, not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 22:19, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see any problem with laziness as a term for inclusion in a list. --Apyule 01:17, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * You're quite right, of course &mdash; but that isn't the reason that many of us want to delete the list (see SuperDude, MCB, MacRusgail, and me, above). --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 11:31, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I can see where you are coming from, but I don't feel that this is an indiscriminate collection of information, or even that difficult to maintain. Lists like this do pose some problems, but I think they are worth it in the end. --Apyule 12:00, 3 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. This list might be useful to some music and song lovers. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:05, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Categorize Lists should be used instead of categories only if there is a definable set of members for which it would ever be possible to have every member listed. This list is by its nature uncompletable, so a category, with appropriate subcategories, is the way to go. We have a category system, we should use it for collections like these! Caerwine 02:19, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.