Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs by Keane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 05:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

List of songs by Keane
"Every song on album by Keane. Listcruft." Ogdred 00:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The information belongs in articles on the singles/albums themselves, not altogether here. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 00:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Unusually for me, I think this article appears justified as a sensible way to organize the information. My Alt Account 00:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, a valuable source for information related to Keane's songs. Also, we currently already have a lot of song lists .--TBC TaLk?!? 01:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete adequately covered by other articles. Artw 02:23, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment what's the copyright status of those midi samples? Guy 11:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this should be covered in articles on the releases these songs appeared on (and indeed I'd argue that should be the case with all the articles it the list TBC referenced...) This is just another way to slice and dice data that already appears (or should appear) elsewhere.--Isotope23 15:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge with Keane. -- Al e  x  (talk here) 16:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm not sure I like the format in which the information is presented but I don't think it's an invalid article as such. Perhaps the information on the "rare" material could be added here to give the article greater value and dispose of an unneccesary additonal article? Ac@osr 16:46, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above Jcuk 18:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as fancruft. Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information. --Dhartung | Talk 18:23, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - should be in articles on band and albums, not one of its own Ergative rlt 21:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with the Keane page. --Ineffable3000 21:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as fancruft and unnecessary duplication of information found (or should be found) in other articles. -- NORTH talk 08:35, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per what everyone else already said. - 85.210.146.49 22:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ac@osr... but those midi samples are very unlikely to be fair use and should be removed ASAP. The JPS talk to me  18:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Keane. This will be of interest to fans, and has some encyclopaedic value, but doesn't merit its own article. Bridgeplayer 22:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep This is not covered by other articles, we do have a lot of this lists and I did create those MIDI samples. Therefore, I'm uploading a better version of Snowed Under right now. I added the information of the "rare material"--Fluence 23:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.