Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs recorded by Nick Jonas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus to keep. Nakon 00:52, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

List of songs recorded by Nick Jonas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

List of mostly non-notable songs, where the recordings (albums) all have articles. No need for this stand-alone article, esp. since as a topic ("Songs recorded by this recording artist") there appears to be no notability whatsoever. So, it really fails NLIST, in spirit if not in letter, and it does not pass the GNG. All About That Bass (A word?? / Stalking not allowed...) 07:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * NOTE - I am no longer supporting this candidate for deletion. I cannot, however, withdraw this nom because of Chase's delete vote. All About That Bass (A word?? / Stalking not allowed...) 07:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Note - This appears to be a bad faith nomination. The nominator's article is up for deletion at Articles for deletion/List of songs recorded by Meghan Trainor, so he seems to be playing a "If I can't have mine, you can't have yours" game here.  only (talk) 09:48, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. And thanks for pointing . Not only this is a bad faith AfD, he did in a bad way too. Why didn't you notify me MaranoFan? When indeed I created this. Also, I had faith in you, but probably you will never learn... — Tom (T2ME) 10:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment putting articles up for AFD in a way like this does seem to go against WP:POINT. As for the article itself here, I'm on the fence as to whether two solo studio albums is enough for a list. One solo album alone definitely wouldn't be, though. Snuggums (talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 12:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * He has 2 solo albums and one with the Administration for which he bought the rights of the songs basically making his. Anyways, to be honest, I lost interest in this list. However, MaranoFan's behavior is childish and non-encyclopedic at all, whatever the status of this AfD will be. — Tom (T2ME) 12:24, 23 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Bad faith nomination, as noted above by Only; disruptive in nature, and pointy, apparently one of several, and from an editor who never seems to learn. How much longer will the community allow this editor to exhaust our patience?  -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">WV ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">✉ ✓  13:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete despite the bad faith, WP:POINT nomination. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There are few, if any, reliable sources which discuss Jonas' entire body of recorded work in detail. We already have a discography article for Jonas. –Chase (talk / contribs) 16:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)


 * As an admin, I should close this as a clear bad-faith nomination, which, as part of an apparent pattern, is really blockable. As an editor, I agree with deletion. Where to turn? Where to turn? Drmies (talk) 03:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:SK2 requires both a disruptive nomination and no !votes to delete. –Chase (talk / contribs) 15:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep per WP:LISTN, not NLIST, which is not applicable. It is a list of recordings by the artist, not a list of recordings of a specific artist released by a record label i.e. discography, It serves a totally different function. Whether there should be a "minimum size" for these lists may need to be debated and included in WP:NSONG, but until then, the reasons for delete noted above are not applicable. I shall copy myself into the two other similar nominations. --Richhoncho (talk) 19:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per LISTN and per the fact we already have articles named "Songs recorded by X" which until today I wasn't aware of, Makes sense to Keep IMHO. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.