Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs that debuted at number ninety-five on the Billboard Hot 100 in 2020


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

List of songs that debuted at number ninety-five on the Billboard Hot 100 in 2020

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:LISTN. This just seems completely random and unnecessarily trivial. There is no coverage of songs debuting at no. 95 on any chart much less the Hot 100. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 06:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 06:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Billboard Hot 100 or something similar- Honestly, why on Earth does this have its own article? Foxnpichu (talk) 10:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * While I guess it’s a possible search term, there’s certainly isn’t any plausible reason why someone would search for such a thing. Sergecross73   msg me  10:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. There’s absolutely no significance to charting at 95 on this music chart. Sergecross73   msg me  10:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is no evidence of any notability to the position 95 as the entry position on this or any other chart. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 10:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as debuting on a chart at position 95 is not something of note. -- Whpq (talk) 11:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - This was probably created by a chart watcher who likes trivia and number patterns, and that's okay for geek purposes but it does not belong on Wikipedia per WP:LISTN. In an early version of the article, the creator speculated that an unusually high number of songs debuted at #95 in 2020 alone, which may have kicked off a conspiracy theory among chart nerds, but it could just be a wild coincidence.  DOOMSDAYER 520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 14:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:LISTN. Hog Farm Bacon 22:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely no notability, and as I like to believe, if you do it with one chart, you gotta do it with 'em all. Total overkill. ResPM come to my window 20:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, but at least the "one-eyed horse thieves from Montana" now have some real competition. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the assessment of the other posters, that this topic lacks in the notability criteria. Garlicolive (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above arguments, I agree this article has poor notability. Such a specific list would be better suited elsewhere. MagPlex (talk · contribs) 17:13, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator's rationale and the above comments. I do not see this being a viable search term so I do not see a strong reason for a redirect. Aoba47 (talk) 17:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.