Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs that mention each day of the week


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete  (aeropagitica)   16:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

List of songs that mention each day of the week
List with two entries, not useful. Punkmorten 16:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, totally uninformative. -- P199 16:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - not useful to you, maybe, but I found it useful. For great justice. 16:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * reluctant 'delete. interesting idea but seems the creator meant A day not EACH day Mccready 17:00, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Why not "songs that mention girls' names"? Or "songs that mention candy bars"? Delete, delete, delete.  Slowmover 17:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not encyclopedic. Obina 18:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  19:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A connection which isn't worth recording. Piccadilly 20:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - Not a bad idea, actually, but as it lists only one song something tells me it isn't going to turn into anything encyclopedic soon. Won't be hard to create a better article if this is deleted. ProhibitOnions 00:00, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Needed? I think not...yes this is an encylopedia, but we dont need to mention every detail of everything...what next a list of people with X ammount of bodyhair? Walksonwalls 02:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Adios muchachos. --Khoikhoi 03:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing really here, unlikely to be used much compared to the overhead of trying to make it even cover a reasonably significant fraction of it's potential content. Sfnhltb 20:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I put this up for songs and would like to see more put up on this list.RobertCMWV1974 19:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.