Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs titled as acronyms or initialisms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 00:40, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

List of songs titled as acronyms or initialisms

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - as with many other "list of songs titled..." lists, this is a collection of loosely-associated items. The songs on this list have nothing in common beyond a coincidence of naming. They are not similar in style or theme. Otto4711 13:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * D.E.L.E.T.E., for the same reasons as Articles for deletion/List of songs about sleep. Matches WP:LC perfectly. (There are a number of these cases now, and usually the discussion results in "delete" without much controverse; maybe even the PROD process would fit?) --B. Wolterding 13:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete -- if a higher percentage of the songs were bluelinks, it might be worthwhile, but not as it currently stands.--SarekOfVulcan 14:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am beginning to wonder if I write a short essay about lists of song titles with arbitrary elements in their names, and just link to that each time one pops up on AfD.  There's a veritable plethora of them out there.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 15:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 16:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom & ample precedent. Carlossuarez46 17:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not appropriate for an encyclopedia, possibly a violation of WP:NOR Rackabello 22:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR and because No one really cares W1k13rh3nry 22:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per WP:UNENC. Songs have nothing in common other than a quirk of title. A1octopus 20:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not only pointless, but also poorly constructed - even if this were useful information, combining acronyms and pseudoacronyms together makes no sense. Aspirex 06:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.