Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs who's genre is used ahead of time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!?) 05:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

List of songs who's genre is used ahead of time
Is inherently POV and unverifiable. Who defines the genre? Who says it's "ahead of its time"? You can call me Al 23:15, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nomination. It's like 'List of people who are smarter than they look'.  freshgavin TALK 23:38, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maintaining this puppy would be a bitch, even if it was a sensible topic... and it isn't. -- Captain Disdain 23:49, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft --JAranda &#124; watz sup 23:52, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. LOL freshgavin! Ryan Norton T 01:57, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as inherently POV. --Jacquelyn Marie 04:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft: unverifiable, unmaintainable, and inherently POV. MCB 06:56, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone. - Just zis Guy, you know? 11:45, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. - Dalbury 17:46, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Inhearently unclear. Title should be "whose" not "who is" anyway.  ~CS 23:56, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Inherently POV; not sensible as titled. Xoloz 03:50, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What? Flowerparty ■ 16:15, 21 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.