Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs whose title includes personal names


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Doc (?) 23:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

List of songs whose title includes personal names

 * See Centralized discussion/Lists of songs.

Subtrivial listcruft.
 * Delete. Unmaintainable list. --SuperDude 02:56, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Not an unmaintainable list And Many subtitles to this link to make sure and not as dumb of a list as the one a few articles up --JAranda &#124; yeah 03:38, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is the kind of thing people are always looking for when they need to make a mix tape. -- BD2412 talk 03:53, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep interesting and already-well-maintained list. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 04:14, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, valid list. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:22, 2 October 2005 (UTC).
 * Keep. Valid and useful information.--Centauri 06:28, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unmaintainable. --MacRusgail 13:23, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, it wouldn't have been created and maintained if it wasn't of interest. - SimonP 13:52, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * N.B.:When I said "unmaintainable", I meant that there are too many songs with personal names in them. The list could go on forever. --MacRusgail 14:57, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I do not agree that this is unmaintainable. At worst, if it got too large, it could be subdivided into separate pages on specific names. --Jacquelyn Marie 16:47, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per BD2412. Jkelly 17:22, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, it could get huge, but... I don't think it should be deleted. Some use to some people and harmless. gren グレン 21:12, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an encyclop&aelig;dia, not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 22:17, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as yet more preposterous, unmaintainable listcruft. I'm awaiting the inevitable lists of songs including flavors, colors, days of the week, cities, countries, moods, types of belly-button lint, and pokemons. Apparently this seems to appeal to some editors, but I agree that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. MCB 23:07, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.