Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs whose title is more than 10 characters long

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. IceKarma&#x0950; 23:14, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

List of songs whose title is more than 10 characters long
Unmaintainable, essentially incomplete, unencyclopedic, pointless list. a "random collection of information". Strong delete. DES (talk) 22:51, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What's next, List of songs with a noun in the title? --Fire Star 22:54, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * How about List of songs that are six words long? Gazpacho
 * delete. Too inclusive; I could find thousands in my CD collection. &mdash; brighterorange (talk) 23:04, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Unmaintainable list. Jkelly 23:06, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment see Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/Lists of songs and contribute to the discussion &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 23:16, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This is unmaintainable. I think the creator meant the list to be much more narrowly defined than the title literally suggests, but it still seems pointless, and groups essentially unrelated subjects together.  --rob 23:23, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have a feeling that a certain registered user might be behind these. - Lucky 6.9 23:24, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pointless listcruft. Inclusion criteria don't make sense. android  79  23:40, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. I think I understand what the creator of the article was trying to create, but this isn't it. --Metropolitan90 00:03, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Viriditas | Talk 00:15, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Sabine's Sunbird 01:36, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete per everyone that voted delete above. So many things that this article violates, it's not even funny. I could list a good 80% of my music collection, and we'd still have less than a thousandth of one percent of all such songs listed. --Andy Janata 17:59, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * While I would like it gone asap, I don't see tht it violates any speedy criterion. It isn't patent nonsense, and I don't see it as vandalism -- I see no evidence that this wasn't created in good faith but with bad judgement. DES (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Good point. --Andy Janata 22:41, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lists of trivia are sometimes acceptable if they're interesting. This is not one of them. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:30, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This list can be maintained if we include song titles that only have words that have 10 continuous characters uninterrupted with the spacebar.  Agreed? --SuperDude 23:06, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * No. What purpose does such a list serve? android  79  13:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * That might possibly deal with (or at least reduce the strength of the arguemetn for) "unmaintainable". This list would still be unencyclopedic and pointless. DES (talk) 15:10, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I love these lists, but this one doesn't make any sense. Deb 22:34, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete arbitrary list -- red stucco 08:29, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.