Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs with more than one music video (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus again. --Core des at 04:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

List of songs with more than one music video
Listcruft fails WP:NOT, has no place in an encyclopedia, take it to Creem or Tiger Beat'' L0b0t 14:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, per my nomination. L0b0t 14:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not encyclopedic. Mango juice talk 16:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Lists are useful and interesting! --164.107.92.120 16:23, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete absurd. Canonical listcruft. Guy 16:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Kf4bdy talk contribs 17:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unmaintainable, arbitrary list.-- Hús  ö  nd  17:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep; it is rare to go to the expense of making a second music video when one is already in the can; examples help show why it's been done. A2Kafir 18:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * See previous discussion from last go-around in August: Articles for deletion/List of songs with more than one music video A2Kafir 19:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It's plenty maintainable, unlike the innumerable "List of songs about love"-type lists, and it's only been a little more than two months since the last nom, so I'm finding it difficult to assume good faith here. Danny Lilithborne 19:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep the number of songs this relates to is going to be limited, therefor the list is perfectly managable, also it survived a previous afd (I include default "keep"s as surviving btw), just two months ago. Jcuk 22:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per those suggesting it here and last time round - this is a list which has very definite inclusion criteria and can/should be easily maintained. Additionally, as others have said, actually releasing two music videos for one song is an unusual thing to do. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this has no value. Arbusto 00:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above 4.18GB 00:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete listcruft. Bwithh 00:08, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree it is unusual to make a second clip; this is the only list of its type I've ever come across anywhere.Phil500 01:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This list has no value to me personally. However, I think there is a non-arbitrary, sufficiently notable connection between the items on the list to be of interest to people beyond some tiny subculture.  The list is also sufficiently defined in terminology and neither excessively broad nor excessively narrow. -Kubigula (ave) 05:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Phil500 and Kubigula comments. --Deenoe 12:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep same reason as last time: "Since music videos often cost a bit to make, there's usually an interesting reason why a second version needed to be made, often due to controversy such as "Opportunities" by Pet Shop Boys and "Post Post Modern Man" by DEVO" Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Why? Why? Who Cares? More than one music video? List it on the song/artists page. We don't need a list for it. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk) 02:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.