Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sources on lidos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 11:29, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

List of sources on lidos

 * – ( View AfD View log )

We do not need a list of non-notable publications. They can be used to expand the article on lido, but as none are notable in their own right, this is a bibliography rather than an encyclopedic list. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 20:58, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I strongly suggest this be userfied. DS (talk) 22:33, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete At the very least, it looks like a link farm, or a directory type list. This falls well outside the normal "list" criteria.  Dennis Brown (talk) 22:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete It's more of a bibliography than a link farm, but either way does not pass our notability guidelines for lists. --NellieBly (talk) 01:03, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not a directory of reading materials on a topic (i.e. a bibliography). Indiscriminate due to length, and the result of original research regarding which sources to include/exclude. --Cyber cobra (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.