Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of starships in Stargate (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

List of starships in Stargate
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a collection of fictional details without any real world information for proper context or sources to establish notability. This is not a valid article split. The information here is for fans. The general reader will get nothing from such an article. TTN (talk) 12:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment (probably delete) I see no way to merge that and all those citation linking to other articles on wikipedia is a huge red flag for me. This feels like it belongs to the Stargate wikipedia, not here. You should probably ping the voters of the previous AfD. Govvy (talk) 12:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I knew this was coming, so I already merged the present production info to List of Stargate SG-1 characters a while ago (no attribution problems because of the shared merge source List of Earth starships in Stargate, which now redirects to the LoC section) . Any design info on other races' ships could be added to the Mythology of Stargate article in the future. I know that I have some production info on the season 8-10 ships in TV Zone magazines at home, but (1) that doesn't really help with notability as they are interviews with PRIMARY, and (2) I really don't care about spaceships and can't be bothered to dig them up to see if they're really worth much. – sgeureka t•c 13:20, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:ALLPLOT crufty material that belongs on Wikia, etc. Fails WP:LISTN.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:46, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:12, 17 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't think of any fictional starship list that would pass muster. [Insert snarky Jack O'Neill quip here.] Clarityfiend (talk) 21:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:LISTN informational lists should be kept. Lightburst (talk) 23:54, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR. Almost every reference is using another Wikipedia article. Obvious fansite material nothing encyclopedic, therefore does not pass WP:LISTN (Lightburst you haven't even explain how this is actually meets the policy). Ajf773 (talk) 02:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:LISTN. Some more uncited fancruft.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – I agree it fails LISTN; there don't appear to be any RSes covering the set. – Levivich 06:39, 18 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete- Fails our notability requirements, and would be better housed at Wikia. Reyk YO! 09:44, 24 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.