Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of street view services (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 04:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

List of street view services
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTDIRECTORY fgnievinski (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly a notable topic and this is a useful navigational list. WP:NOTDIRECTORY specifically exlcudes articles "that are used for internal organization or to describe a notable subject". A valid delete rationale would need to articulate how exactly WP:NOTDIRECTORY applies to this list.--Pontificalibus 08:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia functions as an index or directory of its own content. is also mentioned in NOTDIR. This is only partially an index of its own content, most of the article is a linkfarm. I voted delete in the last AfD but am subject to retention if this can be dealt with. Ajf773 (talk) 01:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure, the article needs improvement, I'm not sure it should even be organsied by country. However Google Street View, MapJack, Yandex_Maps, CycloMedia and Bing_Maps are enough for a list, which will no doubt grow over time.--Pontificalibus 11:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per Pontificalibus. No deletion rationale has been presented, just a WP:VAGUEWAVE to a policy that expressly supports this type of list. To Ajf773 for the nth time, we do not delete content if issues are fixable, even notwithstanding the fact that your "linkfarm" characterization is very inaccurate here. postdlf (talk) 10:36, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The linkfarm issue I have addressed myself. Ajf773 (talk) 07:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 04:55, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pontificalibus' points. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 10:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Perfect valid list article as it aids in navigation.  D r e a m Focus  16:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep 188.71.207.135 (talk) 19:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.