Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of supermarket chains in Portugal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  19:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

List of supermarket chains in Portugal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

completely OR list MistyGraceWhite (talk) 13:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * KEEP 12 blue links, this serves the list articles purpose of navigation. Just like all the others of its type at Category:Lists of supermarkets.  MistyGraceWhite how exactly do you consider this Original Research?   D r e a m Focus  14:20, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - I count 2 reliable sources at the bottom of the article. According to WP:OR, "the phrase "original research" is used on Wikipedia to refer to material for which no reliable, published sources exist". So the nominator's basis for deletion is incorrect. There are also loads of reliable sources that discuss the distribution chains' market in Portugal, mainly the National Institute of Statistics, that compiles that information in quite a detailed way, and Economy-focused newspapers / retail-focused news, but also mainstream newspapers, beyond what's already in the article. (By the way, did the nominator perform a WP:BEFORE search in Portuguese? The above are just examples) The article List of supermarket chains in the United Kingdom is an example of how the Portuguese article can be improved. RetiredDuke (talk) 14:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Kepp article serves useful for navigation and has reliable sources, not OR.Grapefruit17 (talk) 15:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:LISTN thru WP:LISTPURP: information, and navigation, also WP:GNG as brought out by above. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.