Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tall women (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Procedural close. I'll relist both in one AfD. ~ trialsanderrors 19:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

List of tall women

 * – (View AfD) (View log) Previous Afd, Recent Afd

I put this up again so soon due to the results of Deletion review/Log/2007 January 30. Essentially lists like these are not allowed as it's feared they constitute original research or something, so this isn't per se a discussion. The list will be deleted, most likely regardless of what anyone says. Still I worried about speedying it and thought some could vent for sentimentality sake.--T. Anthony 11:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - Do we really need stuff like this? -- Qarnos 11:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not only is this list completely useless, it is by definition original research. There will always be contention over what "tall" actually means? Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  11:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 11:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Found nested in Articles for deletion/Ziemel, for some strange reason. MER-C 12:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Now consensus do delete List of tall men has been affirmed in DRV, the continued existence of this list is incongruous. WJBscribe 17:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, for all those reasons the others ought to have been kept. Mathmo Talk 18:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.