Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings and structures in Bradford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

List of tallest buildings and structures in Bradford

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There are no tall buildings in Bradford and, with Citygate Bradford still not making any progress, it seems unlikely that there will be a tall building any time soon.

This fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons:


 * Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the overwhelming majority of the buildings featured are not notable enough for their own Wikipedia article.
 * Secondly, this topic does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Database listings in Emporis, Skyscrapernews and Skyscraperpage do not constitute significant coverage.
 * I see no evidence that the topic 'List of tallest buildings in Bradford' is covered as a group by reliable secondary sources but I am happy to be proved wrong here. The closest thing I could find was this.
 * No significant high-rise building under construction so little chance of future notability; no point in sending to draft.
 * The city is not the largest in England nor is it the capital.
 * I really do not believe that a building being taller than 35m makes it notable. We do not set the bar so low in London and Manchester so why are we doing it here?
 * This only meets two of the standards set by User:Bearian. The first two.

Similar AfDs for reference: List of tallest buildings and structures in Wolverhampton and List of tallest buildings and structures in Hull Spiderone  18:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Buildings aren't that tall. Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 21:03, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, on the basis that, though there are some very tall proposed buildings which could justifiably form the core of a list article, there is strangely little or no secondary coverage about them, despite generally being projects from the last 15 years. The Mill chimney and the Town Hall don't justify a list article by themselves. Sionk (talk) 21:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. The city is not notable for tall buildings and the buildings are not notably tall. The list does not meet WP:CLN, there is nothing there that can assist in navigation.  // Timothy ::  talk  21:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per, who cited my standards (there is no official, relevant policy). Bearian (talk) 00:24, 4 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.