Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Kosovo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to  List of tallest structures in Kosovo. (non-admin closure) buffbills7701 17:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

List of tallest buildings in Kosovo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not cite any sources, is made up of original research and violates FUTURE by listing structures that have not yet been constructed (and probably never will be ). Furthermore, a merge to the similar List of tallest structures in Kosovo is inappropriate since the three structures described in this article are listed there as well, albeit that article is also completely unsourced. I think deletion is the best course of action. 23 editor (talk) 20:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:21, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:21, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:21, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I hope you're not claiming this list is original research just because it does not internally contain citations, because that would be incorrect. The important issue is whether the content is verifiable, such that reliable sources exist that could be eventually added to the article. So unless you're claiming that these buildings are made up, or that their height is unverifiable because no RS has ever measured them, let's strike the OR claim. As for WP:FUTURE, you need to focus on the first sentence of that section, which refers to "unverifiable speculation." In other words, if reliable sources have reported on a construction project and what it will consist of when completed, then WP:FUTURE is not offended because that information is verifiable. That said, this probably should just be merged into List of tallest structures in Kosovo, which could be refactored to separate out stats for buildings and note which ones are under construction and are expected to rank high when completed. postdlf (talk) 20:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * ENK Complex Prishtina and WTC Prishtina are probably being built (judging from some Youtube videos), but I have not found any reliable sources talking about them. The other thing I want to point out is that all the content of this article can be found at List of tallest structures in Kosovo. Does it even make sense to merge this article to that one since this is the case? Personally, I think it's better to delete this and get it over with and let List of tallest structures in Kosovo be the main article when it comes to documenting well... the tallest structures in Kosovo. 23 editor (talk) 20:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it makes sense to separate out buildings (which are inhabitable) within the larger group of structures (which aren't necessarily inhabitable), but whether or not that is handled by another table or just a column (as the list currently does) is another question. So ultimately you may be right that there is nothing to merge. If there are enough, we do maintain separate lists, but it's obvious here that there just aren't enough buildings to merit keeping them separate. postdlf (talk) 21:23, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Would you care to support the redirect then? 23 editor (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of tallest structures in Kosovo.-- ELEKHHT 23:31, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per WP:CHEAP. This is hardly a list - it's too run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 23:46, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.